Some of the most fundamental questions for our employment laws are who they apply to, and in what circumstances. This includes determining when someone performing paid work for a business is an employee, and when they can work as an independent contractor.
For the best part of a century, courts have been asked to determine if relationships entered into as independent contracting, are in fact a genuine contracting arrangement or are in reality, employment.
Although two High Court cases in 2022 provided significant clarity for business, the rules have recently been changed again. For the first time, a definition of employment appears in the Fair Work Act. All businesses using contracting, or considering doing so, need to be aware of the new arrangements, limitations, and business risks.
ABS data indicates 1m Australians, equivalent to 7.5% of employed Australians, worked as independent contractors in 2023. Independent contracting was highest in construction (21% of workers), administrative and support services (19%) and transport, postal and warehousing (14%). (ABS (2023) Working Arrangements)
There is a long and complicated history of competing, and changing, court precedents on when work is true independent contracting, and when its real character is employment.
In essence:
One of the stated workplace relations priorities of the Albanese Government is tackling ‘job insecurity,’ and making changes to forms of work the government characterises as insecure, and as undercutting and disadvantaging those in employment.
Independent contracting has been drawn into this following two recent decisions of the High Court which unions, lawyers, academics, and the now government opposed.
The two significant High Court decisions in 2022 emphasised the importance of the agreed terms of a contract in determining whether someone is a contractor or an employee. More weight was attached to how businesses and workers agreed to characterise their legal relationship, making independent contracting more reliable for both businesses (principals) and workers wanting to work as contractors.
This has now been deliberately overturned. As of 26 August 2024, there is a definition of employer and employee in the Fair Work Act for the first time, designed to (a) overturn the two High Court decisions, and (b) to deliberately favour work being found to be employment rather than independent contracting.
Less significance will be attached to the characterisation a worker and business agree attach to their working relationship. Courts will instead determine whether someone is a contractor or employee by examining the ‘real substance’, ‘practical reality’ and ‘true nature’ of the working relationship.
Courts will again look not only to the agreed arrangement, but to how work is undertaken in practice and look again at multiple factors such as who can exercise control, integration into the business, responsibilities and risks, supply of tools and equipment, scope for delegation and subcontracting, and expectations of ongoing work.
This means:
In addition to legislating a definition of employment for the first time, there are changes to the existing rules against misrepresenting employment as independent contracting, known as sham contracting.
At issue is when an employer should be liable for misrepresenting what should have been employment as contracting, and defences available to businesses where sham contracting is alleged.
Prior to recent amendments, sham contracting required a business to have been reckless in regard to whether a particular working arrangement was contracting or employment (which attracts a substantial fine).
As of 27 February 2024, the defence is narrower, and the fines are higher. A business facing allegations of misrepresenting employment as contracting will need to show it reasonably believed it was correct in classifying a worker as a contractor.
From 26 August 2024 eligible independent contractors will also be able to apply to the Fair Work Commission to have terms of their contracts they consider unfair changed or nullified/removed. In resolving such disputes, the Commission will consider factors such as:
If the Commission finds that a contract term is unfair, it will be able to change the terms of the contract, or ‘set aside’ all or part of the contract.
Given these significant changes, it is even more important businesses wanting to use independent contracting (a) take comprehensive, up to date advice, (b) get the written terms of their contracts right, and (c) implement independent contracting properly.
Ai Group has been at the forefront of helping businesses navigate changing law and practice in this area for decades. Our expert team can work with your business to ensure you can structure work appropriately for your operations and be as secure as possible in both your independent contracting and employment arrangements.
There are many ways Ai Group can help you to prepare for and navigate the changes to laws impacting on independent contracting.
Ai Group members can:
Not a member? Request a call or get in touch on 1300 55 66 77.
Ai Group & Ai Group Workplace Lawyers can also provide more detailed assistance on workplace issues, including potentially complex considerations for the ongoing use of independent contractors and drafting up to date contracts.
Employers are being warned to brace for a further range of complex and controversial workplace relations changes soon to come into effect
New ‘wage theft’ laws create an imperative to ensure you are compliant with notoriously complex workplace relations system.
The definition of casual employment is changing, as are arrangements for casuals to move into part-time or full-time work.
The 'Right to Disconnect' is a new addition to Australia's employment laws. Employers need to know what they can and cannot do when the new law comes into force from 26 August 2024.
Please complete your details below and we will get in touch.